The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0969-6474.htm
The role of culture on knowledge transfer: the case of the multinational corporation Leyland M. Lucas
Department of Management and Business Administration, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to look at the issue of culture’s role in knowledge transfer within multinational corporations (MNCs). Studies of MNCs have hinted at the importance of culture to the performance of subsidiaries. Using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions of power distance, individualism/collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, and masculinity/femininity, it is argued that the location of subsidiaries along each of these cultural dimensions will signiﬁcantly impact the possibility of knowledge transfer occurring between subsidiaries. Design/methodology/approach – The objectives were achieved by providing additional insights into the complex nature of knowledge transfer efforts in MNCs. To do so, a discussion of the challenges associated with the dimensions of culture is presented. These challenges are further complicated by the degree to which the home ofﬁce is involved in the strategic decision-making process surrounding inter-subsidiary knowledge transfers. Findings – The paper suggests that managers should pursue knowledge transfer activities cautiously. Although these efforts may be supported by the home ofﬁce, resistance to change and sharing must be carefully managed. Furthermore, knowledge transfer efforts are most likely to be successful if the parties are culturally aligned. And, when this is missing, success is highly dependent upon home ofﬁce directives and support. Research limitations/implications – This paper forces us to address a critical question: how do subsidiaries deal with the challenges to knowledge transfer efforts posed by cultural differences? While research has looked at various aspects of culture and its impact on MNC activities, more research is needed on these issues. As knowledge continues to be emphasized as the basis for performance differences, more thorough examination of the issues affecting it is necessary. In addition, variables such as spatial distance, native origin, and language differences, all of which make translation difﬁcult, are not considered. Practical implications – The ideas presented here reinforce the notion that national context and its impact on culture has major consequences for inter-subsidiary knowledge transfer efforts. This is particularly the case when these transfers involve subsidiaries with different cultural dynamics. Since, knowledge is contextual, this helps subsidiaries identify their partners in this process, what are there beneﬁts to be gained from engagement, and how involved the home ofﬁce needs to be in these transfer efforts. Therefore, managers need to pay careful attention to contextual issues that affect knowledge transfer efforts. Originality/value – It reinforces the notion that subsidiaries have access to conﬁdential information regarding developments in other subsidiaries. This access to inside information allows for the speedy pursuit of knowledge transfer opportunities. However, such pursuits must be tempered by understanding that cultural differences may inhibit success. Keywords Knowledge transfer, Uncertainty management, National cultures, Management power, Multinational companies Paper type Research paper
The role of culture on knowledge transfer 257
The Learning Organization Vol. 13 No. 3, 2006 pp. 257-275 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited 0969-6474 DOI 10.1108/09696470610661117
Introduction As trade barriers are eliminated and national boundaries become more permeable, the transfer of knowledge between subsidiaries of multinational corporations (MNCs) has become increasingly important. Through the free movement of personnel across national boundaries opportunities for knowledge transfer...
References: Albert, S. and Whetten, D. (1985), “Organizational identity”, in Cummings, L.L. and Shaw, B.M. (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
Allen, T.J. (1977), Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Almeida, P. and Kogut, B. (1999), “Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks”, Management Science, Vol. 45, pp. 905-17. Almeida, P. and Phene, A. (2004), “Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: the inﬂuence of the MNC and host country on innovation”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25, pp. 847-64. Chen, C.C. et al., (1998), “How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, pp. 285-304. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990), “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. 128-52. Cullen, J.B. (2002), Multinational Management: A Strategic Approach, South-Western Publishers, Cincinnati, OH. DeLong, D.W. and Fahey, L. (2000), “Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 14, pp. 113-28. Doz, Y.L. et al., (1981), “Global competitive pressures and host country demands: managing tensions in MNCs”, California Management Review, Vol. 23, pp. 63-74. Enright, M. (2000), “Regional clusters and multinational enterprises”, International Studies of Management & Organization, Vol. 30, pp. 114-38. Gargiulo, M. and Benassi, M. (2000), “Trapped in your own net: network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital”, Organization Science, Vol. 11, pp. 183-201. Garud, R. and Nayyar, P.R. (1994), “Transformative capacity: continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 365-85. Gupta, A.K. and Govindarajan, V. (2000), “Knowledge ﬂows within multinational corporations”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 473-96. Hall, G. and Johnson, R. (1970), “Transfer of United States aerospace technology to Japan”, in Vernon, R. (Ed.), The Technology Factor in International Trade, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, NY, pp. 305-58. Hansen, M.T. (1999), “The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, pp. 82-111. Hansen, M.T. (2002), “Knowledge networks: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies”, Organization Science, Vol. 13, pp. 232-48. Hansen, M. and Lovas, B. (2004), “How multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25, pp. 801-22. Hedlund, G. (1994), “A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 73-90. Hofstede, G. (1997), Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind, McGraw-Hill Co., New York, NY. Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture’s Consequences, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA. Holtbrugge, D. and Berg, N. (2004), “Knowledge transfer in multinational corporations: evidence from German ﬁrms”, Management International Review, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 129-45. Inkpen, A.C. (1996), “Creating knowledge through collaboration”, California Management Review, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 123-40. Kedia, B.L. and Bhagat, R.S. (1988), “Cultural constraints on transfer of technology across nations: implications for research in international and comparative management”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, pp. 558-71.
The role of culture on knowledge transfer 273
Kostova, T. (1996), “Success of the transnational transfer of organizational practices within multinational corporations”, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. McDermott, R. and O’Dell, C. (2001), “Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 5, pp. 76-85. Martin, J. (1992), Cultures in Organizations; Three Perspectives, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Martin, X. and Salomon, R. (2003), “Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation”, Journal of International Business, Vol. 34, pp. 356-73. Nohria, N. and Ghoshal, S. (1994), “Differentiated ﬁt and shared values: alternatives for managing headquarters-subsidiary relations”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 491-502. Osland, G. and Cavusgil, S. (1996), “Performance issues in US-China joint ventures”, California Management Review, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 106-30. Pablos, P. (2004), “Knowledge ﬂow transfers in multinational corporations: knowledge properties and implications for management”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 8 No. 6, pp. 105-16. Pak, Y. and Park, Y. (2004), “A framework of knowledge transfer in cross-border joint ventures: an empirical test of the Korean context”, Management International Review, Vol. 44, pp. 417-34. Phene, A. et al. (2005), “Knowledge transfer within the multinational ﬁrm: what drives the speed of transfer?”, Management International Review, Vol. 45, pp. 53-74. Polanyi, M. (1962), Personal Knowledge, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Rogers, E. (1983), The Diffusion of Innovation, The Free Press, New York, NY. Schein, E. (1985), Organizational Culture and Leadership, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. Schulz, M. (2001), “The uncertain relevance of newness: organizational learning and knowledge ﬂows”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, pp. 661-81. Sherif, M. and Cantrill, H. (1947), The Psychology of Ego Involvements, Social Attitudes, and Identiﬁcations, Wiley, New York, NY. Song, J. et al. (2003), “Learning by hiring: when is mobility more likely to facilitate interﬁrm knowledge transfer”, Management Science, Vol. 49, pp. 351-65. Sorensen, O. and Stuart, T. (2001), “Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 106, pp. 1546-88. Szulanski, G. (1996), “Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the ﬁrm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 27-43. Triandis, H.C. (1995), Individualism and Collectivism, Westview Press, Boulder, CO. Trice, H.M. and Beyer, J.M. (1993), The Cultures of Work Organizations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Trott, P. (1993), “Inward technology transfer as an interactive process: a case study of ICI”, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cranﬁeld University, Cranﬁeld. Veiga, J. et al. (2000), “Measuring organizational culture clashes: a two-nation post-hoc analysis of a cultural compatibility index”, Human Relations, Vol. 53, pp. 539-57. Zander, I. and Solvell, O. (2000), “Cross-border innovation in the multinational corporation: a research agenda”, International Studies of Management & Organization, Vol. 30, pp. 44-67.
Zhao, H. and Luo, Y. (2005), “Antecedents of knowledge sharing with peer subsidiaries in other countries: a perspective from subsidiary managers in a foreign emerging market”, Management International Review, Vol. 45, pp. 71-97. Zollo, M. and Winter, S. (2002), “Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities”, Organization Science, Vol. 13, pp. 339-51. Further reading Gupta, A.K. and Govindarajan, V. (1991), “Knowledge ﬂows and the structure of control within multinational corporations”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, pp. 768-92. Corresponding author Leyland M. Lucas can be contacted at: firstname.lastname@example.org
The role of culture on knowledge transfer 275
To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: email@example.com Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints
Please join StudyMode to read the full document