The Ethics of Price Gouging

Topics: Morality, Ethics, Moral Pages: 47 (17423 words) Published: October 3, 2011
THE ETHICS OF PRICE GOUGING

Matt Zwolinski

Abstract: Price gouging occurs when, in the wake of an emergency, sellers of a certain necessary goods sharply raise their prices beyond the level needed to cover increased costs. Most people think that price gouging is immoral, and most states have laws rendering the practice a civil or criminal offense. The purpose of this paper is to explore some of the philosophic issues surrounding price gouging, and to argue that the common moral condemnation of it is largely mistaken. I will make this argument in three steps, by rebutting three widely held beliefs about the ethics of price gouging: I ) that laws prohibiting price gouging are morally justified, 2) that price gouging is morally impermissible behavior, even if it ought not be illegal, and 3) that price gouging reflects poorly on the moral character of those who engage in it, even if the act itself is not morally impermissible.

1. Introduction

I

n 1996, Hurricane Eran struck North Carolina, leaving over a million people in the Raleigh-Durham area without power. Without any way of refrigerating food, infant formula, or insulin, and without any idea of when power would be restored, people were desperate for ice, but existing supplies quickly sold out. Four young men from Goldsboro, which was not significantly affected by the storm, rented refrigerated trucks, bought 500 bags of ice for $1.70 per bag, and drove to Raleigh. The price they charged for the ice was $12 per bag—more than seven times what they paid for it.' This kind of behavior is often referred to as "price gouging." Many states. North Carolina included, prohibit it by law. And even when it is not legally prohibited, it is generally thought to be exploitative and immoral.^ The purpose of this paper is to explore the philosophic issues surrounding price gouging, and to argue that the common moral condemnation of it is largely mistaken. I will make this argument in three steps, by rebutting three widely held beliefs about the ethics of price gouging: 1) that laws prohibiting price gouging are morally justified, 2) that price gouging is morally impermissible behavior, even if it ought not be illegal, and 3) that price gouging reflects poorly on the moral character of those who engage in it, even if the act itself is not morally impermissible. The core of my argument will be that

© 2008. Business Ethics Quarterly. Volume 18, Issue 3. ISSN 1052-150X.

pp. 347-378

348

BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY

standard cases of price gouging provide great benefit to those in desperate need, that they tend to lack the morally objectionable features often ascribed to them such as coercion and exploitation, and that attempts to prohibit the practice will harm individuals who are already vulnerable and can least afford to bear further harm. The argument of this paper is an exercise in non-ideal theory.^ Much of what bothers us about price gouging, I suspect, is the fact that it takes place in a social context where the background political and economic institutions are less than fully just. Many people object to the inequality which pervades the distribution of wealth and social services in the United States, and worry that price gouging either exploits or exacerbates that inequality. The real problem, such people might say, is not price gouging itself but the more fundamental issue of an unjust basic structure. I do not wish to deny that questions about the basic structure are important. But they cannot be the only questions that are important. If our basic structure is unjust, then we still need to decide how individuals should act, and how particular policies should be formulated, in the context of our unjust society. Part of what we should be doing, to be sure, is trying to make the basic structure more just. But assuming that this goal will not be achieved immediately, we still need to decide what to do about price gouging here and now. Before we can proceed to...

References: Aquinas, T. 1918. Summa theologica. London: R. T. Washboume. Barry, B. 1986. Lady Chatterley 's lover and Doctor Fischer 's bomb party: Liberalism, Pareto-optimality, and the problem of objectionable preferences. In J. Elster & A. Hylland (Eds.), Foundations of social choice theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bastiat, F. 1995. What is seen and what is not seen. In G. B. de Huszar (Ed.), Selected essays on political economy. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Foundation for Economic Education. Boston Globe. 2004. City seeks to buy excess flu vaccine. October 15: B2. Available at http://www.boston.eom/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2004/10/15/6 _accused_of_rmv_permit_scheme/. Bowie, N. E. 1988. Fair markets. Journal of Business Ethics, 7: 89-98. Bowie, N. E., & Werhane, P. 2005. Management ethics. Maiden, MA: Blackwell. Buchanan, J. 1999. Cost and choice: An inquiry in economic theory. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Crist, C. 2004. Attorney general charges two Horida hotels with price gouging. Retrieved November 27,2007, from http://myfloridalegal.com/_852562220065EB67 .nsf/0/A15CA108BCBFlDDE85256EF30054D0FC?Open&Highlight=0,gouging ,palm,beach. CuUity, G. 2006. The moral demands of affluence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dressier, J. 2006. Understanding the criminal law, 4th ed. Newark: LexisNexis. Famsworth, E. A. 1982. Contracts. Boston: Little Brown and Company. Federal Trade Commission. 2006. Investigation of gasoline price manipulation and post-Katrina gasoline price increases. Retrieved August 29,2007, from http://www .ftc.gov/reports/060518PublicGasolinePricesInvestigationReportFinal.pdf.
T H E ETHICS OF PRICE GOUGING
377
Feinberg, J. 1983. Legal paternalism. In R. Sartorius (Ed.), Paternalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 1986. Harm to self. New York: Oxford University Press. Frankfurt, H. 1973. Coercion and moral responsibility. In T. Honderich (Ed.), Essays on freedom of action. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Fuller, L. 1964. The morality of law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Gode, D. K., & Sunder, S. 1993. Allocative efficiency of markets with zero-intelligence traders: Markets as a partial substitute for individual rationality. Journal of Political Economy, 101: 119-37. Gorr, M. 1986. Toward a theory of coercion. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 16: 383-406. Haidt, J. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108: 814-34. Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. 1993. Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 613-28. Hayek, F. A. 1944. The road to serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1968. Competition as a discovery procedure. In F. A. Hayek (Ed.), New studies in philosophy, politics, economics, and the history of ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1980. The use of knowledge in society. In F. Hayek (Ed.), Individualism and economic order: 77-91. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. 1982. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kamm, F. 2006. Intricate ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kant, 1.1994. The metaphysics of morals, part n. In James W. Ellington (Trans.), Ethical Philosophy, book 2, pp. 31-161. Indianapolis: Hackett. Kirzner, 1.1979. The Perils of Regulation: A market process approach. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami School of Law, Law and Economics Center. 1996. The meaning of market process: Essays in the development of modern Austrian economics. New York: Routledge. Leff, A. A. 1967. Unconscionabihty and the code: The emperor 's new clause. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 115. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M., & Green, J. 1995. Microeconomic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mayer, R. 2007. What 's wrong with exploitation? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24: 137-50. Meyers, C. 2004. Wrongful beneficence: Exploitation and third world sweatshops. Journal of Social Philosophy, 35: 319-33. Miller, R. 2004. Beneficence, duty and distance. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32: 357-83. Munger, M. 2007. They clapped: Can price gouging laws prohibit scarcity? Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://www.econlib.org/LIBRARY/Columns/y2007/ Mungergouging.html. Murphy, L. 2003. Moral demands in nonideal theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
378
BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY
Nozick, R. 1969. Coercion. In S. Morgenbesser (Ed.), Philosophy, science and method. New York: St. Martin 's Press. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books. O 'Driscoil, G., & Rizzo, M. 1996. The economics of time and ignorance. New York: Routledge. Rapp, G. 2005-2006. Gouging: Terrorist attacks, hurricanes, and the legal and economic aspects of post-disaster price regulation. Kentucky Law Journal, 94. Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice, 1st ed. Cambridge: Belknap Press. Raz, J. 1982. Liberalism, autonomy, and the politics of neutral concern. In P. French (Ed.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 8. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 1986. The morality of freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sample, R. 2003. Exploitation: What it is and why it 's wrong. New York: Rowman and Littlefield. Samuelson, P., & Nordhaus, W. 1998. Economics. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill. Schmidtz, D. 2000. Islands in a sea of obligation: Limits of the duty to rescue. Law and Philosophy, 19: 683-705. 2006. Elements of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Simmons, A. J. 1993. On the edge of anarchy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Singer, P. 1972. Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1: 229-43. Skarbek, D. Forthcoming. Market failure and natural disaster: A reexamination of antigouging laws. Public Contract Law Journal. Skarbek, D., & Skarbek, B. 2008. The price is right!: How price gouging laws delay post-disaster recovery. Unpublished manuscript. Santa Clara University. Smith, V. 1982. Market as economizers of infoimation: Experimental examination of the "Hayek hypothesis." Economic Inquiry, 20(2): 165-79. Sollars, G. G., & Englander, F. 2007. Sweatshops: Kant and consequences. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17: 115-33. Sowell, T. 2004. "Price gouging" in Horida. Jewish World Review, September 28. Retrieved November 15, 2007, from http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/ sowell091404.asp. Wertheimer, A. 1996. Exploitation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2006. Coercion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Zimmerman, D. 1981. Coercive wage offers. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10: 121-45. Zwolinski, M. 2007. Sweatshops, choice, and exploitation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17: 689-727.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay on Ethical: Ethics and Price-gouging Laws
  • Ethics Position Paper on Price Gouging
  • Price Gouging Essay
  • ethics of Essay
  • Essay on ethics
  • Ethics Essay
  • Ethics Essay
  • Ethics Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free
Dynasty Icon Pack v4.1 APK Premium | True Detective | Manga list