Criminal Punishment: Utility vs. Retribution

Topics: Morality, Ethics, Immanuel Kant Pages: 2 (504 words) Published: March 28, 2013
Eva Rivera 3/7/13
Phil 108 – EthicsShort Paper #2

Criminal Punishment: Utility vs. Retribution
Chapter 10 – Topic #3

The practice of punishment is part of our society and functions to maintain social order. However, there are a couple different view points regarding how to appropriately carry out punishment. Retribution and Utilitarianism are two philosophies that have very different views on the theory of punishment.

Philosopher Immanuel Kant asserts that Retribution is the model for punishment. Kant argues that punishment should be governed by two principles: 1. people should be punished solely for the reason that they have committed a crime and 2. punishment is to be in proportion to the severity of the crime (Rachels 142). For example, a small punishment is suitable for a small crime and a more serious punishment is suitable for a more serious crime. Furthermore, Retribution means that a person committing a crime will be held responsible for their actions. Kant’s moral theory states humans, having the capacity to reason and make choices for themselves, need to be held accountable. If we don’t, then we are treating them as if they were not rational, reasonable agents. Furthermore, justification of punishment comes from the nature of the crime and does not consider if the consequences are good or bad, just that the person pays the penalty for having committed the crime. This view point is vastly different that the Utilitarian model of punishment (Bzdak PP).

The Utilitarian view point always considers the consequences of punishment. The foundation of Utilitarianism is that happiness is the ultimate goal and we need to do whatever we can to maximize this. Punishment is wrong (immoral) because it is, inherently, an unhappy circumstance. However, punishment is moral if the good outweighs the bad. Punishment should lead to good consequences; it should help the person being punished so both society and the...

References: Rachels, S., & Rachels, J. (2012). The elements of moral philosophy (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Philosophies of Punishment: Retribution Essay
  • Rehab vs Retribution Essay
  • Introduction to the Criminal Justice System: Punishment vs. Rehabilitation Essay
  • Punishment vs Rehabilitation Essay
  • Punishment vs Rehabilitation Essay
  • Essay about Criminal Behaviors, Punishments and Sentencing in the Criminal Justice System
  • Essay about Capital Punishment Deters Murder, and Is Just Retribution
  • The Various Theories of Punishment in Criminal Law Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free
The Masked Singer | Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie (1) | no tears left to cry - Ariana Grande