Unit 1 Case Study
An opinion paper considering the “Betrayal” hypothetical In this case study Jane is accused of her husband’s murder. She was identified by a witness however Jane insists she was out of town at the time of the event but has no supporting data to collaborate her story. The purpose of this paper is to discuss whether I would forge Jane’s signature on a document to prevent her from being found guilty in a court of law and potentially receiving the death penalty. In addition, I will discuss this as it pertains to utilitarianism, egoism, and Interpretations of the “Golden Rule” from Hinduism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and Confucianism. I will also discuss the results by the application to the facts and consider the questions: Was it right for you to forge your client’s signature on the register? Would your answer be the same if the client was your child, spouse, or parent? And communicate the positive and negative outcomes of each solution. For me, the level of my relationship with Jane would determine my action. This along with social capital would establish tolerance of risk, along with accepting Jane’s story as the undeniable truth. Social capital is a reflection of value invested in a relationship. Dictionary.com defines Social Capital as: An economic idea that refers to the connections between individuals and entities that can be economically valuable. Social networks that include people who trust and assist each other can be a powerful asset. These relationships between individuals and firms can lead to a state in which each will think of the other when something needs to be done. Along with economic capital, social capital is a valuable mechanism in economic growth.
Networking Guru Ivan Misner relationships are divided into 3 levels: visibility, creditability, and profitability (VCP Process©). In this model relationships are taken through a sequential process begin at visibility, establishment of creditability and...
Cited: Shaw, W. H., & Barry, V. (2010). Moral issues in business. (11th ed.). Belomont, CA: Wadswoth Cengage Learning.
Velasquez, M., Claire, A., Shanks, T. and Meyer, M.J. (1992) Ethical Relativism. Retrieved from: http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/decision/ethicalrelativism.html
Johnson, Robert, (2010) "Kant 's Moral Philosophy", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Retrieved from: URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/kant-moral
Please join StudyMode to read the full document