Speaking with Names
In the beginning of this article, the first point that is mostly stressed is ethnographers. He tries to emphasize that they’re study points should be more than just a language. He believes that in order to understand they’re custom and traditions they need to take into consideration the land in which they live in. Here are a couple examples of what he says about it. “In other words, one must acknowledge that local understandings of external realities are fashioned from local cultural materials, and that, knowing little or nothing of the latter, one’s ability to make appropriate sense of “what is” and “what occurs” in another’s environment is bound to be deficient. For better or worse, the ethnographers see, landscape and speech acts do not interpret their own significance” Then he goes to explain that in contrast, Natives see the outside world and think that it is done in a very non-pleasurable way. So the same idea applies to them, because they don’t live in that society they don’t understand how their location and different situations affect other situations. They wouldn’t be adapted, or at least not until they learned the proper way of doing things while being in a different environment. Example from the reading:
“Constructions of reality that reflect conceptions of reality, the meanings of landscape and acts of speech are personalized manifestations of a shared perspective on the human condition”
The natives interact with the landscape in three different ways. 1) They observe the landscape
2) They may modify it or make changes to the landscape according to a use in which they want to exercise. 3.) They will discuss about the landscape in social gatherings or such events In order for an ethnographer to grasps these concepts as a native he suggests to attend a “native place names.” He suggests that the giving of names is associated with emotions, which can help better understand a culture.
Speaking with Names: Lola is a...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document